Press Freedom Index Highlights Problems in Zambia
Zambia is ranked 115 in the latest World Press Freedom Index published by Reporters Without Borders, scoring lower than countries such as Mozambique, Angola, Kenya and Ethiopia.
The organisation, which promotes and defends the freedom to be informed and to inform others throughout the world has shared the following analysis of the situation in Zambia:
“An increase in political tension since President Edgar Lungu’s reelection in 2016 has been used as a pretext for drastically restricting the freedom to inform and gagging the independent press. The authorities closed the most important independent newspaper, The Post, in June 2016 and arrested members of its staff. Several radio and TV stations also had their licences withdrawn. Prime TV, a commercial TV channel that was very critical of the government, was suspended for a month in 2019 after being accused of contributing to the ruling party’s defeat in a parliamentary by-election, and was closed for good in 2020 for unclear reasons.”
The report continues, “To prosecute journalists, the government either uses financial pretexts (such as non-payment of taxes in the case of The Post) or the various laws regulating defamation and sedition. A newspaper editor who had been sentenced to 18 months in prison for contempt of court was finally released in late 2019 after nearly a year in prison.”
“Physical attacks against journalists and media outlets are common, especially during elections. Ruling party officials sometimes threaten to close media outlets for not covering the president “properly”. The government also announced its intention to tax free phone calls on social media, a facility widely used by Zambia’s journalists and bloggers. The increase in intimidation, attacks and prosecutions has fuelled an increase in self-censorship. The promised law on access to information has yet to be adopted, while a law on cyber-security and cyber-crime is causing concern. Many journalists and bloggers suspect that it will be used to gag the media and impose Internet cuts more easily,” the report concludes.